Offer on the table for Grabovski
#1
Posted 17 February 2012 - 02:30 PM
#5
Posted 17 February 2012 - 02:56 PM
I would wager that deal was ***-for-tat with the inner circle of buddies. Just like I always assumed Cliff Fletcher had some influence in the Phaneuf deal.If the Leafs got Lupul and Gardiner for Beauch last season, I cannot see Burke taking that.
edit: haha... foiled by the censors again.
#6
Posted 17 February 2012 - 02:58 PM
Just curious. It used to be MacKenzie who had all the early dope on trades. Has Dreger ever been right and predicted a trade? I don't know 'cause I don't follow or listen to him.
Both Dreger and Mac were present during the conversation. It was during TSN's tradecentre round table discussion. I am not to good with the links but go to TSN.ca and you can watch the video on the right hand side of their home page!
#7
Posted 17 February 2012 - 03:09 PM
I see. Well if that is true then obviously Burke has no desire to re-sign him which seems odd and unlikely. That's why I don't follow that crap anymore.
Both Dreger and Mac were present during the conversation. It was during TSN's tradecentre round table discussion. I am not to good with the links but go to TSN.ca and you can watch the video on the right hand side of their home page!
#8
Posted 17 February 2012 - 03:14 PM
I see. Well if that is true then obviously Burke has no desire to re-sign him which seems odd and unlikely. That's why I don't follow that crap anymore.
Not necessarily no desire. In that same conversation Dreger speculated that plan A is still to re-sign Grabovski; plan B is trading him.
Just because Burkie's entertaining offers doesn't mean he doesn't want to re-sign Grabs. It just gives Burke an out if Grabovski wants too much money or an unreasonable term or something. It's just smart managing not to be painted into a corner on Grabovski's contract negotiations.
In regards to the actual offer, it would depend on the prospect, but I don't see us winning this trade, even if Burke nets a 1st instead of a 2nd.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "otherwise you wouldn't have come here."
~ An excerpt from Alice's Adventures in Leafland
#9
Posted 17 February 2012 - 03:18 PM
I don't see Burke doing anything before trade deadline anyways. I very highly doubt were getting Nash. Even though i'd love to have him we need to let our players develop and go through the draft to keep developing.
#10
Posted 17 February 2012 - 03:25 PM
FML
#11
Posted 17 February 2012 - 03:31 PM
Plan A, Plan B. That's really going out on limb. That's like saying the Leafs might win tomorrow, or they might lose.
Not necessarily no desire. In that same conversation Dreger speculated that plan A is still to re-sign Grabovski; plan B is trading him.
Just because Burkie's entertaining offers doesn't mean he doesn't want to re-sign Grabs. It just gives Burke an out if Grabovski wants too much money or an unreasonable term or something. It's just smart managing not to be painted into a corner on Grabovski's contract negotiations.
In regards to the actual offer, it would depend on the prospect, but I don't see us winning this trade, even if Burke nets a 1st instead of a 2nd.
#12
Posted 17 February 2012 - 03:41 PM
Plan A, Plan B. That's really going out on limb. That's like saying the Leafs might win tomorrow, or they might lose.
How is it going out on a limb to assume Burke has a back up plan if he can't get Grabs signed? I certainly hope he does or he's a terrible GM.
Here's the scenario as I see it.
Burke negotiates with Grabs and his agent up until the trade deadline, Grabs and his agent want at least X million for X years and won't budge. Burke thinks Grabs is only worth Y million and wants Y years on the deal. Now should Burke
i) Bet on getting the deal done and then if necessary let Grabs walk in the off season to a team that will give him X million for X years.
ii) Work on a trade in the meantime so he has an alternative to losing Grabs for nothing in case a deal isn't done by the deadline.
How is it not smart to have a plan B when dealing with an impending UFA?
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "otherwise you wouldn't have come here."
~ An excerpt from Alice's Adventures in Leafland
#13
Posted 17 February 2012 - 03:46 PM
Because it's a given. Everyone already knows his contract is up. Plan A and Plan B doesn't even seem worth mentioning except for one reason. TSN has spots to sell and they don't have **** to talk about except the same old daily drivel.
How is it not smart to have a plan B when dealing with an impending UFA?
#14
Posted 17 February 2012 - 03:49 PM
Tell that to Buffalo when Drury and Briere bolted for nothing after their contracts ended...Because it's a given. Everyone already knows his contract is up. Plan A and Plan B doesn't even seem worth mentioning except for one reason. TSN has spots to sell and they don't have **** to talk about except the same old daily drivel.
Being a GM must be so easy.
#15
Posted 17 February 2012 - 03:58 PM
You missed my point. I am talking about reporters feeding the masses hypothetical news that's already easy to assess without the aid of hyped out sensationalized propaganda.Tell that to Buffalo when Drury and Briere bolted for nothing after their contracts ended...
Being a GM must be so easy.
That was my only reason for the original question I asked about Dreger.
#17
Posted 17 February 2012 - 04:54 PM
Because it's a given. Everyone already knows his contract is up. Plan A and Plan B doesn't even seem worth mentioning except for one reason. TSN has spots to sell and they don't have **** to talk about except the same old daily drivel.
Someone within the Toronto organization provided TSN with the information, otherwise the second team would be known. If that's the case, and Burke has done this before with other organizations, the information was "leaked" to pressure Grabo's agent into rethinking his bargaining position.
Grabo presumably likes it here but rumor is he wants a hefty deal. Burke is letting him/his agent know: I will move you, without hesitation.
#20
Posted 17 February 2012 - 04:59 PM
So, you think Grabovski is worth a top 5 pick?
IMO, it's garbage unless the prospect is a recent top 5 pick... just to clarify
even though, he's a pending UFA at seasons end....
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











